Monday, January 24, 2022

The New Jerusalem

 When Ivan Karamazov says, "If there is no immortality, then everything is lawful," he means it to be shocking. The point is that without eternal punishment, there's really nothing to stop us from murdering people if we feel like it. But he forgets to listen to what he himself is saying, because the whole proposition depends on the word "if." His unspoken premise, of course, is that there is indeed no immortality--but, luckily, he only thinks that because he's being a stupid-face.

 


There's really no point in doing anything if it's not eternal. But here's the beautiful thing: if anything truly is eternal, then that means everything is eternal. Either nothing matters, or absolutely everything does. I've talked before about the care and craft that God, the Master Builder, puts into every molecule of this world. We in turn put care and craft into every detail of our daily lives, even if we often do it automatically, by sheer force of habit. (Force of habit's not always bad, after all.) When we throw on our clothes and go to work in the morning, we're building something.


The great medieval cathedral builders used to place a tiny gift at the top of the tallest steeple when construction was finished, a little present just for God. (That's also why we put on our best clothes for church: wrapping ourselves as presents for Jesus.) In Tomie de Paola's Legend of the Poinsettia, the heroine learns that every gift is beautiful because it is given, and the weeds she offers to Baby Jesus turn into magnificent flowers. Every weed, every pebble, that we offer to God is becoming a piece of a cathdral, a flowering city that we're building together. That may sound a bit trite, but that's because it's an image of truth, a furtive memory we all have in the back of our minds. The Plans of the Architect, which we glimpsed before we were born.

 


When we look back at our lives from the summit, we'll see we've been dragging ziggurats up massive slopes. Every hardship, a buckle in the harness. We spend our lives maneuvering titanic chunks of masonry--but unlike Sisyphus, our toil is not in vain. When we throw on our clothes and go to work in the morning, we're chiseling filigree into some nook of the Great Cathedral. Wasted work? There's no such thing. God loves it. And in the New Jerusalem, our friends will have an eternity to stumble across the little details that we ourselves have forgotten about and say, "Oh hey, that's cool." Our work, our work, our daily bread: we're building the New Jerusalem.




Chickens and Chain Mail

For many fans of Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings movie trilogy, the “making of” featurettes are almost as fun as the films themselves. In the extended documentary of The Two Towers, we get to see a great deal about how New Line Cinema created the Fighting Uruk-Hai, the goblin horde that assails our heroes at Helm’s Deep. One of the things that strikes many people as nearly insane is the level of detail that went into their clothing and, in particular, their armor. For every single one of the hundreds of extras who worked on these movies, entire shirts of real, functioning chain mail were hand-forged: shirts that could not even be seen in the films because they were usually covered with cloaks!


Why put in so much “needless” work? Well, bear with me. My beautiful bride has a long-time love affair with ducks and chickens which I have always found endearing, though slightly baffling, and a few months ago, we finally decided to start keeping a few chickens of our own. In the process of learning about how to tend them, we have watched various documentaries, including one called The Natural History of the Chicken.


This film reveals profound depths in the physical and (yes, I know how it sounds) psychological underpinnings of the chicken. I know, love, and respect these creatures far better now, despite the fact that I still feel as though God had an uproarious time inventing them. It’s just a silly little bird. Why put so much care and craft into every feather? No one’s going to notice. Most of the feathers can’t even be seen!


Well, now you see where I’m going with this. You may not see every ring of the Orcish armor, nor every feather of the chicken’s plume. But we can feel the love, the absolute love, that went into every molecule of these things. Why put in so much needless work? Because it’s needless! Because love gives itself in superabundance. Because chain mail is cool and chickens are fun and God is so in love with us it’s insane!




Armor and Waycloak

One of the many, many bits of wisdom the Church has accumulated through the centuries is the use of small bodily gestures by the faithful. People laugh, I think, because we do these things--genuflecting, dipping our fingers in the holy water, and so forth--without thinking about them, but to do them without thought is exactly the point. We don't think about breathing either, unless something's off-kilter. When we're upset or scared, then we have to focus: breathe in--breathe out. It's no accident that Ki, the word that Westerners use to mean life-force or energy, really means breath: just as it's no accident that pneuma, wind, also means the Holy Spirit.


My dad likes to tell a story about a lady he knew when he was a boy, who taught him to let a few droplets of water fall from his fingers when he blessed himself at the holy water font in the vestibule. Why? As a little offering for the thirsty souls in Purgatory. The punchline of the story is that he met her again, many years later as an adult, and told her he had always remembered her teaching him that--and it turned out she herself had forgotten it in the interim! He was given the gift of being able to teach it back to her.

 

My wife taught me something when we were dating: when you make the Sign of the Cross, don't just flick your fingers around. What you are doing is donning the Armor of Righteousness and the Waycloak of the Pilgrim Church, so cover your torso with bold movements. Yes, it ought to be reflexive (unless something is off-kilter!), but reflexive doesn't mean unintelligent. Drawing your sword in the face of a dragon is reflexive.

 

Eternity is always happening now, in the small bodily moments. That's the whole point of us, of souls in dust--it's why we're neither beasts nor angels. It only makes sense to train your body to worship the Lord of Hosts, just as we do with our minds and hearts and souls. So when you make the Sign of the Cross, brothers and sisters--raise it high.




Tuesday, August 10, 2021

He-Man and the MOTU Proprio

Just hear me out. This article's premise may sound like something that began as a ludicrous joke and then snowballed--and that's because it is--but when I followed the thread long enough, it brought me to a far deeper level of the labyrinth. So, first, let me explain the joke.


Back in the 80's, there was a cartoon called He-Man and the Masters of the Universe. I haven't watched it since I was a kid, so I've managed to remember it being awesome. Now, a few weeks ago, Netflix created a reboot called simply, Masters of the Universe (or MOTU), in which--spoilers--the putatively titular character, He-Man, is immediately killed and replaced by Teela, the infinitely perfect female character who is better than all of the males at absolutely everything. It's Woke. Fans aren't happy.



You're welcome.


Also a few weeks ago, Pope Francis issued a type of proclamation known as a Motu proprio, "On his own initiative," which means in effect that it's the answer no one wanted to the question no one asked. In this particular document, entitled Traditionis Custodes (Custodians of Tradition), he upholds Catholic tradition by decreeing that there shall be no Traditional Latin Mass in any parish where it's not already celebrated; and that, furthermore, in any parish where it is celebrated, it shall continue to exist only at the discretion of the bishops, many of whom hate the Traditional Latin Mass. It's exactly as subtle, and exactly as honorable, as shooing emancipated slaves away from the democratic process by enacting a law that you can only vote if your grandfather voted.


Now, how does the confluence of Roman legalese with English acronym represent anything more than a slightly amusing pun? Because it's just one visible swirl of the Butterfly Effect: a stray gust from the hurricane raging through dimensions we can't perceive. In the Middle Ages, folklore held that God allowed demons to tempt us, but compelled them to give one warning sign, however clandestine, of their true nature--hence the phrase "showing the cloven hoof." I mean, I'm not suggesting the Supreme Pontiff is working directly with Netflix (although who knows? Gone are the days when a useful distinction could be drawn between a crazy conspiracy theory and, simply, a theory), merely that pop culture and theological doctrine represent two sides of a single pincer. Attacking tradition under tradition's guise and using He-Man to push toxic femininity: it's the same insidious hoofprint.


As finite creatures, we can't see "the big picture." Yes, if Providence exists at all, true randomness is out of court--either everything connects or nothing does--but for daily functioning on our own assigned scale of being, we rightly distinguish between essentials and accidents. To fash ourselves rummaging for synchronicity in the leaves of tea or the guts of birds, "Describe the horoscope, haruspicate or scry" (The Dry Salvages), is foolish and, also, forbidden. But every now and then, when you're going about some more or less innocuous business of your own, a piece of shrapnel from the larger cosmos hits you on the head. I dunno, maybe it's just a coincidence. Except--it's not.


Wednesday, February 10, 2021

The Pride & Prejudice Perplexity

I've met a fair-to-middling number of people over the years who have stated, with varying degrees of intensity, that they wish they could live in the time of Jane Austen. I must courteously dissent.


The first and more obvious objection is simply that your average English longshoreman or tenant farmer was not going about in four-horse carriages and attending opulent debuts every Friday evening. The entire point of Mr. Darcy (for instance) is precisely that he does not represent the norm. Even the other rich people in his circle vied for his condescension. The same would hold true in any epoch you might care to idealize; knights and samurai were always the landed aristocracy, and being a peasant has consistently sucked throughout the story of Man. At least if you're poor in 2021, you can still get Novacaine when they pull your teeth. To live in the time of Jane Austen and be fabulously wealthy, you need a minimum of two magical wishes.


But after all, most people already recognize this, or will acknowledge it if it's pointed out. The real perplexity is a surprising variant on the same essential fallacy, but is far less commonly observed. Apart from the lavish costumes and sumptuously appointed parlours, the true appeal of Austen's cosmos has always been the rich, enduring splendor of her dialogue. Who wouldn't want to spend time in the company of Miss Eliza Bennet, even if it were only as her maidservant? But here's the thing.


Elizabeth, exactly like Darcy, is crucially and overwhelmingly not the norm. Her wit operates on a level so far above most of her interlocutors (and interlocutrices) that many aren't even capable of perceiving it. You could go almost so far as to say that this is the entire point of the bloody story: neither she nor Darcy can find an equal until they find each other. (I know Elizabeth has Jane, the beatific foil to her asperity, but Jane is simply too magnanimous to grasp the methods and motivations of meaner spirits. In Biblical terms, innocent as a dove but not wise as a serpent.) In short, the scintillating conversation that flows from Austen's mightiest heroine was not the parlance of the quotidian.


It might be objected that, at the very least, any random aristocrat could be safely presumed to have a "basic" education that vastly outstrips all but the most advanced schooling of the present day. They wouldn't express themselves in emojis and lol-speak, and could hold up their end of a tete-a-tete. To this I reply that the only real divide between Elizabeth's youngest sisters and a vapidly tweeting 21st Century tween is the accident of their being born in different eras. Can it be doubted that if Mrs. Bennet were alive today, she would clutter every cranny of cyberspace with mortifying Facebook posts?


Nay, friends. The gleaming world of banter and badinage that we envision as Austenian England existed only inside the Austenian mind. If some bored and whimsical power should ever decide to grant your wish, whisking you back to the tag end of the 18th Century, the only advice I can give you is to seek employ as the humble maidservant of Miss Jane Austen herself.




Friday, January 29, 2021

Mama Chimes In: Our Precedented Times, in Communion and Continuity

by Ellen RM Toner

Perhaps, like me, you are tired of hearing about how we live in unprecedented times. Perhaps, like me, you have wryly commented with friends and family about how we wish things could go back to being just plain precedented.

Well, I’ve been coming to an epiphany, and it finally coalesced, so, here you go: These times are not unprecedented in the least. We are simply experiencing the “crisis” du jour. The only thing unusual is our reaction to them. And, that’s something we can change, meaning that we can rejoice, take a breath, and remember that the apocalypse is not upon us.

Understanding Community

For a long time, I thought of myself as self-made, self-sufficient, healthy, enterprising and, ultimately, unstoppable. I took great pride in saying things like, I got my first job when I was 11, I started paying for all my own clothes when I was 14, I left home for college when I was 17 and I put myself through school, working three jobs and taking extra credits so I could finish sooner and save more on loans. And, at the age of 21, I started teaching high school. As you might be thinking, I still do take great pride in those accomplishments. Perhaps too much….

I mentioned to my dear husband last week that, over the past 5 years, I’ve been gradually coming to terms with the fact that actually I’m not very healthy. Though I am hard-working, when my Sister Ass of a body allows it, I’m astounded by how much help I need. I’m being forced to acknowledge that perhaps many of the things I did in my early years of “I can conquer the world by myself” are now catching up with me, at the ripe old age of 32. Lord help me as the decades progress!

In late September, I started shaking. Sometimes just tremors in my head, neck, and arms, sometimes my whole body. With multiple trips to the ER, visits to neurologists in Boston, and some imaging and testing completed, we know now that I don’t have a brain tumor or anything like MS, which is great. But, I do have non-epileptic seizures, or, Functional Neurological Symptom Disorder. It’s not that uncommon (one neurologist referred to it as a “known-unknown”), but “they” don’t know why it happens or how to make it stop. It gets worse when I’m tired, stressed, or when my senses get overstimulated. This has translated into me leaning on my family for a lot of help: my married sister bringing our girls to her house and leaving me dinner; my convent sister coming once a week to cook, clean, and play with her nieces; my parents bringing us casseroles and company on days when I feel disheartened, and helping us bridge the financial gap for all the medical bills. Having one more unusual health thing going on is a total drag, but having structured time and regular visits with family has been wonderful. As I look at my 7 wonderful siblings, both near and far (and think about the one in heaven), my parents’ 16 grandchildren (and counting), I keep thinking, boy are we lucky to have back-up like this—I get to be part of a clan.

“We must decrease, that He may increase.

When Jamey and I were getting married, “thrifty” as we were, we had initially planned on a small wedding. But, when I literally started having nightmares about not having people there, we realized we needed to find a way to invite everyone. So, as some of you might remember, we fed our guests beans and rice on paper and plastic, accompanied by kegs of Bud Light. And, we were able to invite over 400 people; in December in New England, over 250 of them were able to come. The priest waived the fee for using the church. A friend made the cake. Other friends brought hors d’oeuvres. Another friend sewed an image of Our Lady of Guadalupe onto the priest’s chasuble, since we were married on her feast day (having Chipotle food was liturgically correct, you might say!). Another friend made some alterations to my clearance-rack dress, and I wore my mother’s veil. My oldest sister sewed a button back on my dress minutes before I walked down the aisle. My convent sister made me a crown of flowers and my bouquet. Friends brought holly and ivy and red berries from their yards to help with the rest of the flowers. One of my little brothers emceed, and one of my bridesmaids ran the playlist on her phone for dancing. And, of course, friends sang for the wedding mass. Jamey and I have lived in a lot of places, and with a lot of different people over the years. We had friends and family there from all over New England, naturally, but also from Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas, Minnesota and Colorado, people we had known for decades, and maybe not seen in a decade, and people we had only known for a few months. And, they all came together to help us put on this huge, wonderful party near my hometown. It was especially the mothers of my childhood friends, who really went all out making food for the reception, who amazed me. I hadn’t really seen or talked to a lot of them in years, but they were there, ready to help. That sense of support was hugely instrumental in our decision to move back north from the DC area; we wanted our kids to grow up in a place where it was second nature to the people to take care of each other like that. 

One of the things I said to Jamey as we were planning our wedding was that it wasn’t really our wedding, that we needed to remember that day that it was about the community, and that our marriage would be part of our society, and that we needed to build that give and take into the fabric of the day, to have it forefront in our minds. That’s what makes a wedding feast a Wedding Feast, with all of the theological significance that it deserves. It was, no doubt, my mother who had at some point put that idea into my head. And, just as my dad was about to walk me down the aisle, he completed that thought by leaning down and whispering to me, “We must decrease, that He may increase.”

One of the things that I’m working on with this whole seizure thing is to get my mind in a place where everything calms me down, somewhere I can go when it starts ramping up. I started out picturing this spot by the Contoocook River in Peterborough, NH, sitting with Jamey, his arm around my shoulders. We’re on a mossy, low bank, on a bench under the pine trees, with a steep hill behind us that tucks us away from the path and lets us feel focused on this wide, quiet spot in the river, which follows on the waterfall just upstream. Sounds peaceful, right? It didn’t work. I kept getting the sense of imminent danger, like we were in Truman’s bubble world, but that the shield might be permeated at any time by the madding crowd, the sound and the fury, lurking just on the outside.


I reevaluated, and I realized that the “perfect moment” that I needed to picture was actually from our wedding day. Not a place of sheltered isolation, but a place where I was surrounded by my lifetime’s worth of friends and family. When it was time to toss the bouquet, I had a moment of inspiration where I realized I could run up to an old balcony, so I pushed aside some dusty brooms, mop buckets and room dividers and raced up the stairs. Dancing across that little balcony, with The Marvelettes singing Too Many Fish in the Sea, and the literally hundreds of faces of loved ones looking up at me and celebrating with me—that is a memory that makes me feel truly happy, no matter what. Summed up in one word, that memory speaks of communion: Jamey and I had given, as much as we could, to as many people as we could, one hell of a good party, though I do say it myself. And they had given it to us, just as much, if not more so. That, and not a quiet river bank, with the two of us isolated from the rest of the world, is where we could find security, relief, and peace. 


A Continuity of Communion

I’ve been listening to some podcasts about music lately, specifically how to approach sacred music in modernity (thank you, Paul Jernberg!). In one of these, Jernberg enumerates three things that need to be present for this music to work: a sense of preservation of the past, a sensibility for how to facilitate participation in the liturgy, and an energized desire to fuel organic growth and continuity. Preservation, participation, and continuity. And then, he goes on to a brief discussion of the contemporary prevalence of secular humanism, which in turn has three elements that create an uphill struggle in this musical endeavor: a disregard of history as outdated, stuffy and irrelevant (Jernberg quotes Henry Ford: “History is more or less bunk”); the idea that we humans can each solve our own problems with enough empirical knowledge and grit; and, finally, the increasing tendency to put ourselves first. So, I’ve been thinking about these three elements of humanism and how they’ve manifested in my own life (egocentric, much?). And, I’ve also been thinking about how they apply in this “unprecedented” era of COVID.

I suspect that anyone who knows me would agree that I don’t disregard old-fashioned, traditional things. Perhaps too much the reverse. But, what about the second idea, that of self-reliance, which sets itself up in opposition to a participation that engenders community? So much pride in the “self-made” accomplishments of my youth! I hope I am not too generous in forgiving my own faults when I suggest that it is a common mistake of youth to think that we have made ourselves by ourselves. (That is the central tragedy of James Joyce’s Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, whether Joyce knows it or not.) For one reason or another, I realized lately how much I owe of who I am now to the choices that my parents made when they were in their 20’s and 30’s, so much so that I had them over for dinner for the express purpose of telling them how grateful I am for the multitude of hardships that they took on, and gambles that they made, to get my siblings and me to where we all are today. If I learned to seek out beauty, it was because they showed it to me. If I learned how to work hard, and to sometimes practice discipline, it was because they taught me the paradigms, and eventually the reasons behind them. They handed it all down to me, which, incidentally, for all you Latin etymologists out there, is exactly what tradition means: tradere, to hand over.

As for the egocentrism, naturally this goes hand-in-hand with the idea of self-reliance. If I can figure everything out on my own, then life only needs to be about me, and I only need to look out for me. But, if other people have modeled and taught me what I know and how to share what I have, then I have a duty to be generous in returning that gift to them to the extent that I can—and to pass it down to the next generation, precisely to and beyond the point that the gift requires me to decrease, that they may increase.

When I think back on the continuity of this communion, that is, on traditions of sharing, giving, taking and supporting, physically and spiritually, I think about the generations who came before us, and what trials they might have had to endure and support each other through. Because, the fact of the matter is, history and traditions are not “bunk,” but rather the defining fabric of our own persons and society. With that understood, let’s look back a little ways.

Precedented

2008 was a pretty rotten year for a lot of us, myself included. All my hard work, and there I was, getting ready to graduate college, with a pocket full of debts and zero job prospects, as our economy was nose-diving into the worst slump in almost a century. How about 1962, the year of the Cuban missile crisis? Or the 1950s, which brought the “duck and cover” drills, that were supposed to protect you in case a nuclear bomb fell? Or the 1930s and 1940s, which brought rations and world-wide death and fear? Or the 1910s and 1920s, which brought the first World War, the Spanish Flu devastation, and eventually the Great Depression? What about the Middle Ages, and the multiple rounds of bubonic plague, and an average life expectancy of 33? What about the Dark Ages, that followed on the fall of the Roman Empire? When I think back on all of these things, and then think about the past year, and occasionally using a Kleenex instead of toilet paper on my nice white toilet with my indoor plumbing, occasionally washing my hands with a different kind of soap at my sink with hot running water, because the store was out of toilet paper and my normal kind of soap, and then think on how about as many people die of heart attacks each year in our country as the number of people who have died of COVID in this year since it all started, I start to realize that these times are not so unprecedented after all. It’s simply one more round, in one generation after another, following on millennia of people getting sick and dying, trying to make ends meet (2 weeks ago, Jamey started his fifth temporary job since March 2020), and figuring out how to help each other through it. Namely, one more generation of the human condition.

Except, lucky us, now we have humanism, which means we’re supposed to do it all on our own. That is what is unprecendeted. When the going gets tough, and we’ve decimated our communities by living in a way that makes us believe that they are superfluous, we are, on one level or another, forced to come to an unprecendented realization: though we need each other, we have pockmarked the social fabric that gives us the paradigm in which to practice that give and take, that communion. 

Communion comes with a hefty tradition of importance during times of trouble. The Black Death killed about 30 percent of the world’s population (COVID has killed about .01 percent); that Black Death percentage went up to almost 50 percent among priests. They prioritized Communion in their care for the sick. (Illustration by Michale Welply in Die Pest, Geißel der Menschheit, 2006.) 

Giving is going to hurt. Any parent can tell you that. But it’s also the sine qua non of humanity. Even in those dusty Middle Ages, with bubonic plague raging, they knew that. We owe it, not by any means just to ourselves, but especially to our friends, parents, siblings, cousins, co-workers, and especially to our children, to remember that the physical gift of self is a non-negotiable element of full humanity. We have bodies; we should use them. He did; He still does.

Wednesday, November 25, 2020

Catholautism

 

So it turns out I have Asperger's. We took our girls in for a checkup--months ago now--and our doctor, God bless her, remarked on how unusually squirmy our elder daughter was during the eye exam. These tidings were not, for us, fresh information; Sonya has been such a lovely little eel from day one that whenever I hold another baby, they feel so motionless by contrast that I have to keep checking to make sure I didn't set them down somewhere and forget. But apparently, exaggerated photosensitivity can often be a "tell" for autism presentation. In a zany twist, I have the same symptom; and our doc is familiar enough with my abattoir of a mental state that she quickly connected some dots. The condition is often hereditary (sorry, darling), so if she showed signs, it made sense for me to get tested too. 


A whole battery of exhaustive evaluations later--broken up, of course, by everyone getting fired from everything for the bulk of this ugly year--I was diagnosed. Ellen, my brilliantly organized and motivated helpmeet, was the one who found me a mind-brain doctor and then importuned her for weeks on end to make her assessment. When she got off the phone with the brain-mind lady, walked into the living room, and said, "You have autism," it yanked a skyscraper of rugs out from under me. For a second, I actually thought I had heard, "You have cancer."


But ultimately, the truth is so extremely not surprising that I accepted it pretty fast. I was homeless, off and on, for 15 years. I invented a poetic form in which every other syllable rhymes, and wrote a 57-stanza epic in it. I feel more at ease curled up inside of a cupboard than in most social situations--that, or I'm so aggressively friendly that people assume I'm either drunk or insane  (both, it turns out!). I have bizarre under- and overreactions to almost everything. Most of all, I just don't work right. Asperger's is a neurological condition, a hardware problem, not only a psychological one. All my life I've felt that I simply couldn't process daily life the way I should--the way "neurotypicals" (as we Aspies like to call the normals) do. I was literally right. In some ways, the diagnosis feels very exonerating. And, of course, the "you have cancer" feeling has largely faded in light of the knowledge that this isn't something creeping up or hanging over me: it's already part of me, it has been all along.


Like probably most people, I still hear "autism" and think "Rain Man." But, luckily (?), I'm high-functioning enough to be morally and socially responsible for my own life choices. I smashed and blundered through a whole lot of road hazards to get this far, but now we know. Now we can start, not fixing me, because there's no "cure," it's just how my brain is wired, but we can start correcting for my tendency to pull to the left. Like driving a car with a splashy tire; we just have to lean harder on the steering wheel. As a group of wise men said long ago, "Now we know--and knowing is half the battle."

I'm guessing the other half is drugs? We'll see how it goes.